“Harry potter and Deathly Hollow”

As My view point about the novel Harry Potter and Deathly Hollows…

              “Harry potter and Deathly Hollow” written by J.K. Rowling in 2007. It is speculative fiction.  It’s all about Fantasy, Children's Literature, Quest, Bildungsroman, Magical world, Adventure life. And we found in novel Light & darkness. This novel in Third person narration. It is thriller, adventure, brooding, emotional, suspenseful. In novel J.K. Rowling use of many imaginative worlds and it is magical world, use symbols. So now we explain Harry potter in Many  thinks like that:

1.  Feminist reading of Hermione’s character in Harry Potter:

                            

                    “Harry potter” series in Hermione is center Female character in novel. As feminism is range of political, ideological, cultural, personal and economical equality that not foe only men but also for women. She is beautiful and intelligent girl. She knows about her magical tricks and how uses them. She is Intelligent and worries girl. At begin film in Hermione is brave girl; her friends are Harry & Ron. As Rowling is female writer as portrayed of women are intelligent and smart, not for weak & dumb characters.

             This novel all about to Feminine perspective but in other thought not margin of Women. But it is all about to Anti Feminine ideas. She is confident, and constantly stood up for herself and her friends.  But we see that Women works are smarter than men. As we say about Hermione has central women protagonist. As we see Hermione character in film we see that Men (Harry & Ron) use of Hermione. She loves Ron.  Harry and Ron rescue Hermione from a troll, but instead of holding it over her head and acting superior, they treat it as a bonding experience. And also she jealous to other female characters. As we thinks about to critical that in film every time magic, talk to Dumbledore, Fight with Veldemor & Harry, Broken to Horcruxes at that point Hermione not there. It means that as something brave or mysterious work women not do that. Hermione broke only one Horcruxe.

              In one scene Hermione solves a logic puzzle. she and Harry realize that only one of them can go on to save the Sorcerer's Stone. Whereas the other will have to go back. Harry tells Hermione to go back, trusting her to save Ron and find Dumbledore while he tries to save the Stone... which means that he trusts her to save his life. As it is she does not know. She thought that she every time do good. Relationship to these boys. 

 Rowling’s argument that as intelligent and something done as humanity at that time women are not present. So in novel we see other women like: GINNY, PADMA – PARVATI, HARRY’S MOTHER LILY, LUNA, HELENA,  MINERVA, DOLORES UMBRIDGE etc. We see not only Hermione but other women are present as good and evil thinks. We know Man would be proud to call himself wizard, but will women be proud in calling her witch? Definitely not. Because there is something wrong in the structure and language of society. It is constructed language and Rowling point of view. It is problematic. They are powerful and intelligent one. But at end Rowling has portrayed as weak character.

2.  Discourse on the purity of Blood and Harry Potter:

             

    Harry potter film as related to Purity and Blood. It is  identity of human hood. It means that Rowling has given Humanity are not free by birth. As person becomes power and destiny change that it may become pure. Harry Potter in Concept of purity of blood (race, Caste) is very much present in the Harry Potter. Establishing social order by master race is not a new idea. Killing other as inferior race is very prominent in the history. “Harry potter” in main Protagonist like:  Harry Potter and Hermione Granger are Mud -blood. Ron Weasley is a pure blood. Draco Malfoy is also pure blood. Where as evil Voldamort is Mud Blood but craving for pure blood. We see entire narrative is MUD BLOOD. Main concept that Rowling proof that MUD Blood Protagonist as powerful & intelligent rather than Pure Blood person.

 Rowling main ideas that Mud Blood has good not, as mud blood person as crave of purity. we have to keep in mind that Rowling is not despising Pure blood. Voldamort is evil and he is also mud blood. if writer make Voldamort as a pure blood, is problematic.  As witches & Wizards are powerful of magic and it may be that Race & Connection of Blood. This novel Rowling Criticize that Pure Blood people.  This Entire novel connected to racism working within the magical world. It may be Rowling Satire on Society. They believe in pure blood and difference in their mind.  So we can say that the novels play with the thesis of pure blood (Master Race) – Ron, Malfoy, giving an anti-thesis by belonging protagonists to half-blood / Mud-blood (Harry, Hermione, Voldamort).  

E.g. : INDIA CASTE SYSTEM.

3).   The theme of Choice and Chance:

                                The question of choice versus chance runs throughout the Harry Potter series. In Novel We see that when Riddle & Voldemort tells Harry that "IT WAS MERELY A LUCKY CHANCE THAT SAVED YOU”. Harry is self - sacrifice to only for his chance. In one scene Dumbledore subsequently tells Harry that IT IS OUR CHOICES  THAT SHOW WHAT WE TRULY ARE, FAR MORE THAN OUR ABILITIES.

              Throughout the series, Voldemort continues to insist on chance as the cause of his downfall, right up to the bitter end. Harry Potter contains magical prophecies; the prophecies come true only because people choose to act on them. And Even the magical hat takes people's choices into account, as Harry reminds his son in the epilogue. Here WE CAN SAY THAT HAT & ELDER WAND CHOOSE HIS USER NOT PERSON CHOOSE HIS/HER HAT & ELDER WAND. Similarly, if Harry's choice to sacrifice himself has truly broken Voldemort's power.  So that Voldemort's spells are no longer binding, then Voldemort would also be unable to defeat Harry even if he had gained ownership of the Elder Wand. Unless the Elder Wand was powerful enough to overcome the charm on Harry's blood. it is choice rather than chance that decides the issue. Rowling herself has written that she does not believe in fate, but in "HARD WORK AND LUCK, AND THAT THE FIRST OFTEN LEADS TO THE SECOND." We see Rowling point that Not fate, then’ but is the outcome due to choice or chance in the end? We see Harry use his magical power as misuse. But Veldemort use power as his desire and cavity of pure blood.  Veldemort has evil but it means that his choice not for chance. 

                     E.G. Karana belongs to Royal family. But as fault of Kunti that Karana as Sutputra. That is not Karana’s Choice. He Becames poor & Sutputra. But As Karana’s Chance rather choice to Upper caste or leave Royal Family.

       So the ending of Deathly Hallows contains three possible resolutions an ending driven by choice alone. And an ending driven by chance and an ending driven by both choice and chance.

“Da Vinci Code” by Dan Brown

According to My point of views are…

          “Da Vinci Code” is written by Dan Brown in 2003. This novel is detective story. Da Vinci Code I narrative as third person.  It is all about to Leonardo Da Vinci’s paintings code. It is connected to Christianity. This novel is not anti Christian. It is investigated around the investigation of the family of Jesus. It is speculative literature. ‘Da Vinci code’ is Thriller (Poplar Literature), Full of Suspense, Conspiracy theory in them. It is connected to ‘Da   Vinci’s vitruvian man.’ So now we see my perspective of the novel “Da Vinci code”…

•            Yes, I am agreeing with to Dan Brown statement. We see it not anti Christian novel. But those believe in god. They are watch film and Read novel. It is not hurt to religious people.  It is connected to Christianity and religious feeling of Christian people.  Center theme is Christianity but it is deconstruct ideas of Christian religious.  May be it is not Deconstruct idea of Christianity but reconstructed. Last supper of Mary Magdalene and her relationship to Jesus as not doubt but may be thought about to critical that it is fake.  The book is anti Christian but journey is spirituality, follower of god and faith in god. In novel we see that Robert Langdon is protagonist. He is believed in god and symbolist. He is blind follower of God and tradition man. So here is only to spiritual thinks and not hurt Christian but mysteries and secret of Christian religious. It is not faith of god (Leigh Teabing) and tradition follower man (Robert Langdon, Louver, Bezu Fache, Silas, Denny). Also Sophia does not believe in god but as faith of herself. It is trust of our self and love of them.  Just only for truth of Christianity. So I agree with Dan Brawn statement and it is all about “an entertaining story that promotes spiritual discussion”. And may be Dan Brawn perspective and it is religious book, just only for positive attitude for introspective and exploration of our faith in god.

•                       As we studies to Biblical novel or text. It is not harmful to humanity. But as we see that Milton’s Paradise lost as Biblical text. This narrative has been state forward. Paradise lost in Adam and Eve as center and Fruit of knowledge becomes problematic. We see that God say that ‘you are free’. It means what you done as our own desire and what we like it’s done. But here we see Eve tree knowledge and eat Apple as harmful to humanity. Milton portrayed Eve has Beautiful, question to Adam   and How Satan, Raphael and Serpent use to Eve.  It is harm to our society and we see that Satan as evil character but it is true of them. Eve knows about everything but then and then it does create problem. Our Knowledge becomes evil to us.  In Da vinci Code we see that Langdon’s know and his skill of symbolism as helpful. We see that it is not harmful to Christianity and humanity. Langdon has solve mystery of Holy Grail (SANGREAL, ROYAL BLOOD), Last Supper of Mary Magdalene, opus die etc. But in one point that Langdon as faith to god and solve to mystery of Holy Grain. He never tells to other people like (Bezu Fache, Leigh Teabing, Sophia, society people). It is religious and Spiritual thinks but as protagonist Robert Langdon was solve mystery. He prayed to God as Mary Magdalene’s grave. So it biblical narrative and maybe it is religious book.  No doubts that it is harm or damage society. So Paradise lost in some problem of narrative but as we thinks about to critical and modern think that Da Vinci Code is much appropriated narrative. And it is biblical text. It is not damage of humanity but what we thought? What we trust to god? ‘Paradise Lost’ – Milton is problematic as some point but ‘Da vinci code’ – Dan Brawn as faithful to Humanity. It is narrators ideas but what we thought about that’s important. That’s why Da vinci code does not harm humanity.

•            As we study to literature, but main point that how the narrator portrayed of women has only beautiful or something negative/positive chanters.   It is dependence of writer and narrator. But what we look at portrayal of women in text, book and film. It is good or bad thought. So now we explain Popular women character in Film like (Ophelia- Kenneth Branagh’s ‘Hamlet’, Elizabeth- Kenneth Branagh’s ‘Frankenstein’, Hester Prynne – Roland Joffe’s ‘The Scarlet Letter’, Hermione – David Yate’s ‘Harry potter’, Sophia Neuve – Ron Howard’s ‘Da Vinci Code’)  

           Kenneth Branagh’s Hamlet in Ophelia was beautiful, sensitive, emotional, innocent and weak character. She loves to Hamlet and her father Polonius them. But in one point Hamlet tells that you go to Nunnery. Here it faults of Ophelia.  In film we see that Ophelia’s body use for Hamlet as lover & Father. In Film many scene Ophelia as nakedness, use for sex and her madness. That’s why at end she was dies for her madness.  Portrayal of Ophelia as bad and madly but it is not in Shakespeare play ‘Hamlet’s Ophelia’. 

       

   Kenneth Branagh’s Frankenstein in Elizabeth was Beautiful, Innocent and weak character. We see in the film Elizabeth character was not much develop. It is fault of narrative techniques. Elizabeth was margin in novel. But Men (Victor) use for Elizabeth as Only for Sexually. It is not in Mary Shelley – Frankenstein’s Elizabeth. She is weak and helpless character.

          Roland Joffe’s The Scarlet latter in Hester Prynne was Beautiful, sensitive mother, love for her child, innocent and hopeless character. She is love to Dimmesdale but as society says that she was sinner and she done crime to birth girl child. She was hopeless and Helpless. It only that Hester has faulted, Dimmesdale love them but in Film we see that Roland’s portrayal Hester’s relationship to Dimmesdale & Chillingworth. It is badly portrayed in the Film.

      David Yate’s Harry potter in Hermione was Beautiful, sensitive, intelligent, smart and Worrier girl. David portrayed Hermione has good, beautiful and smart than Harry & Ron. Hermione has becomes friend and motivated to Harry & Ron. But David yate’s Hermione has major part and something mysterious thinks. She is not present there. In one scene Hermione became object to two friends and use for their emotional in film. She is not weaker but as Broke to Horcruxes. She only has broken one Horcruxe. Here it is not Hermione has helpless but she has intelligent girl. Nothing else in the film. Hermione has modern girl and Thought about better than men.       

        Ron Howard’s Da Vinci code in Sophia was Beautiful, Intelligent, Smart, and Not Believes in God. Here we see that Sophia was knowledgeable woman. She was cryptologist and at begin to end solve mystery. But in one scene Sophia was ask question to Leigh Teabing.   

And she was that time innocent.  It may that here is Fault of narrative. How Two Men Robert Langdon & Leigh Teabing has help them but she proof that her knowledge and work as help them. She is Holy Grail and royal blood of Jesus. So Ron Howard’s Sophia has modern thinks and better to Men.

               So we can say that Director or Producer portrayed women character as there thinks and it connected to audience demined. What is audience like them? That’s why it becomes popular. It is not real portrayal of all women character like Ophelia, Hester, Elizabeth, Hermione and Sophia. They are portrayed that women are Helpless, beautiful and use for men as only for sex. It is reality of western society. But here fault of narrative and portrayal of women character in the film. 

Rooth ker janai walai, mujhe tujh se koi gila nahi...

Rooth ker janai walai, mujhe tujh se koi gila nahi,
Berukhi qabool hai, muhabbat ka koi sila nahi,

Lambi hai yeh shaam e ghum aur waqt bohat hai,
Niklay thai jis ki talash main manzil per woh mila nahi,

Dasht-e-tanhai hai ya phir haal-e-dil hai yeh mera,
Jaise k hawa chali bagh main aur patta koi hila nahi,

Jisne dil dai ker bhi tawaqo rakhi dil laine ki unn se,
Ghareeb ko qarz deta hoga zakat fisabilillah nahi,

With anger you have left us but we have no greivences,
Your aloofness is welcome because for love we expect no return,

This night of loneliness is long and much a time is left,
In whose search we left was not to found when we reached,

Is it the barren dessert or is this the state of my heart?
For the wind blows but not a leaf moves,

He who after giving their heart, expects one in return,
Gives not charity to the poor but a loan instead,

- Hassan Bin Fahim

Movie Review of the film “Slumdog Millionaire”.

Movie Review of the film “Slumdog Millionaire”.

             “Slumdog Millionaire” is directed by Danny Boyle, and written by Simon Beaufoy. It is release in 2008.  This film sets are in Indian Slum. it is loose adaption of the novel “Q & A” wrote by Vikas  Swarup. It is all about to telling story of Jamal Malik age 18 from Juhu slums of Mumbai.  His story was rags to riches.  He was contestant on the Indian version of who wants to be a Millionaire? We see that his talk answers every stage correctly. he is accused of cheating. How he was poor boy and bad thinks in his life. He was self learner. He is not any thinks of education but what happened in his life. He do learn them and given correct answer of them. He was good observer and self learn skills of him.  The story narrated by Jamal Malik. And he told to how his life learning in identifies this question answer. He tells to the police man in police station.

   The film begins to Juhu slum 18 year old boy Jamal Malik is contestant on the Indian version of Kaun Banega Crorepati. it is all about question and answers, than win grand prize. At that time he is detained and tortured by the police, who suspect him to cheating because of the impossibility of a simple  “Slumdog” person as never ever little education knowing all the answers. as story goes on. Jamal recount and memories though flashbacks the incidents in his life which provided him with each question.   

We see in the film, Jamal's flashbacks begin with his managing, at age five, to obtain the autograph of Bollywood star Amitabh Bachchan, which his brother then sells, followed immediately by the death of his mother during the Bombay Riots. As they flee the riot, they meet Latika, another child from their slum. Salim is reluctant to take her in, but Jamal suggests that she could be the third musketeer whose name they do not know. The three are found by Maman a gangster who tricks and then trains street children into becoming beggars. When Salim discovers Maman is blinding the children in order to make them more effective beggars, he flees with Jamal and Latika to a departing train. Latika fails to board the train and she is recaptured by Maman. Over the next few years Salim and Jamal make a living travelling on top of trains, selling goods, picking pockets, working as dish washers, and pretending to be tour guides at the Taj Mahal, where they steal people's shoes. At Jamal's insistence, they return to Mumbai to find Latika, discovering that she has been raised by Maman to become a prostitute and that as a virgin. she is expected to fetch a high price. 

The brothers rescue her, and Salim kills Maman with a gun. Salim then manages to get a job with Javed Maman's rival crime lord. Back at their room, Salim orders Jamal to leave him and Latika alone. When Jamal refuses, Salim draws a gun on him, and Latika persuades him to go away to protect him.

  

 We see in the film, a tea-boy in an Indian call centre. Jamal searches the centre's database for Salim and Latika. He fails in finding Latika but succeeds in finding Salim, who is now a high-ranking lieutenant in Javed's organization, and they reunite. Jamal attacks Salim  who then pleads for forgiveness. We see how directed create and lets him stay in his luxurious apartment. Jamal then bluffs his way into Javed's residence and reunites with Latika. While Jamal professes his love for her, Latika asks him to forget about her. Jamal promises to wait for her every day at 5 o'clock at the VT station. Latika attempts to rendezvous with him, but she is recaptured by Javed's men, led by Salim. Jamal loses contact with Latika when Javed moves to another house, outside Mumbai. Jamal becomes a contestant on Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? knowing that she watches the show regularly. Much to the consternation of Prem Kumar, the show's host, he becomes a wonder across India. Jamal uses the 50/50 lifeline on the penultimate question and during the following break, whilst in the men's room, Kumar feeds Jamal with the answer, but Jamal chooses the other answer and the correct answer.

           In movies goes that believing Jamal is cheating, the police become involved. After an initial beating up, the police inspector listens to Jamal's explanation of how he reached each answer. Here we see to Indian police system. We know that finding all of them "bizarrely plausible".  He allows him to return to the show. At Javed's safehouse, Latika sees Jamal on the news and Salim in an effort to make amends for his past behaviour, gives Latika his mobile phone and car keys, and asks her to forgive him and to go to Jamal. Latika is reluctant out of fear of Javed, but agrees and escapes. Salim fills a bathtub with money and sits in it, waiting for Javed and his men when they realize he let Latika go. We see that Jamal a life lfe learner and how he answer all question and at end his life becomes change. Jamal's final question is, by coincidence, the name of the third musketeer in “The Three Musketeers” which he never learned. Jamal uses his Phone-A-Friend lifeline to call Salim's cell, as it is the only phone number he knows. Latika answers the phone, and, while she does not know the answer tells Jamal that she is safe. Relieved, Jamal randomly picks Aramis, the right answer and wins the grand prize. Javed hears Latika on the show and realizes that Salim has betrayed him. He and his men break down the bathroom door but Salim kills Javed before he is shot, gasping, "God is great." Jamal and Latika meet on the platform at the railway station. It is end to be happy and satisfaction of Indian movies end.

                So we narrative of this film and how Jamal as center in the film. Jamal as life learner. Here we found that as poor boy becomes richer it may be questioning him.  It is Indian dream of many youngsters as becomes richer. Jamal life was rags to richer. And it may be famous and real Indian ideas portrayed in this film. at last we can say that it is Indian concept  ideal film  and society reality of India in the film.

Movie Review of film “Kismat Konnection”

Movie Review of film “Kismat Konnection”

         “Kismat Konnection” is directed by Aziz Mirza. It is release in 2008. Main screenplay by Sanjay chhel, vibhs Singh.  Kismat knonnection in main leadings role play by Shahid kapoor as Raj, vidhya balan as priya, juhi chawla as Haseena bano, vishal Malhotra as Raj’s Friend etc. This story narrated as third person narration. As film begun that Raj was a top student in his school and college days. He was an architect.   He is having much luck in finding work and job. He does every thing but at wants wrong. In film Raj was faithful to religious, superstitious, god and jadutona kind of thinks.  Raj goes to Haseena bano and her advices him that his luck is not good. And also say that he needs a lucky charm or may a person who can changes his life.  

As we know that Indian people always thinks that anybody helps him and his life became good and rich. They not thought about their struggle but only go to shortcut ideas.  Afterwards in film Raj meets priya . She is beautiful and kind girl. She always ready to help the citizens of a community by trying to save a community center. We see here that film portrayed that women are helps to community not her individual ideas. Not in their mind she became free and independence women. Priya was not rigid woman but she helps adult people and helps them.

             As story narrated that although they do not get along at first time. But raj meets Priya aat that time his life and every work do good. And then Raj realizes that priya is his lucky charm and change his destiny. In story Raj love to Priya. But he not says her. At that time Raj helps to Priya. But we see that Raj lie to Priya by telling her that he will help her and save community center.  in that time Raj  has an architect and build mall.  Instead of time as Raj’s Boss said that he build mall. He can finally be recognized as an architect. 

          He also falls in lie with Priya and she too falls for him. But here we see that one lucky charm or may be illusion of Raj. In this story we criticize that how men portrayed women as lucky charm of men. We know that “Every men success in behind of women”. But here story was diffenrt and how men use to women only for his work and job.

In turn story as tragic way but as we know that Indian film in no any drama it’s not popular. When priya finds out the truth about Raj is trying to do. She became very upset and hurt.  We know that Indian women are every time crying and Bechari kind of thinks.  In film we see Priya was educated and intelligent one. That’s why she found solutions. As Raj to make up his lie. Raj sells everything he has them. But Raj at that time not caring his job but he struggle to community center.  He proposes a plan to save community center and ends him wining.  Priya as lucky for him.  After that Priya and Raj finally get together.  Raj’s life changes and he became an architect and start business.   

             This film was not hit but this story was Cavite interesting. How India people think about that his or her charm, luck, destiny. It is melodramatic film. In film full of emotional, climax, love and faith of charm. It is so typical story but its men are think about his life women are help them. And women are lucky charm for him. So it is too difficult that a man thinks to women and as good form them. It is not moral ideas but immortality.

Movie Review of Film "The Reluctant Fundamentalism".

                      As we studies about post colonial literature in how colonizer rules and imaged   of colonial.  Colonialism is the imposition of the beliefs and social practices of the dominant power on the subjugated one, resulting in loss or change of the native culture.We know that post colonial image and how people have to leave and culture there and dominated them. It became anti colonialism and how political with draw of an oppressive power. Mohsin Hamid’s novel “The Reluctant Fundamentalist” it base on film and directed by Mira Nair. so now review about this both film and who is in film and novel, why they’re there and many counter point of film and novel both of them and how filmmaker directed and portrayed of characters and how they gives image of politics and social structure, may be novelist or filmmaker their own ideas and their individualism in film characters and plot of the film.

   

                               “The Reluctant Fundamentalism” written by Mohsin Hamid. As it is Mohin gives ideas about individualism and how novelist has Pakistan life and dramatic monologues and frame of story at time in flash black of protagonist and it may be that political thriller. We see that how has to reality between in film and Reluctant fundamental in this film mean theme. we see that protagonist Chengez to militant academic and In film directed by Mira Nair and how she gives image of character Chengez in film and he is student and he tells story about his journey in American and gives images of how he work there and notorious experience in his life. In film begun that Bobby has leaner and Chengez has speaker and tells what he does them and also bobby has secretly at CIA officer means detective. It has to location of film in Pak tea house in Lahore, Bobby is journalism and interview about Chengez, he wrote about Chengez life in that article.  in novel has base on 2012 political thrillers dram film and also Mohsin Hamid as Pakistan writer and how novel in location and story about that Pakistani family, its became Pakistani man and how want way to America, start business and his professor Jim cross and corporate, guide them and at develop their company at all.  And at begun movie of that who belong of American as  professor kidnapped and bobby know who is killed them and he is detective and ask to Chengez, at film main plot it is that.

                  

                        We see that Mira has to gives ideas about American business, and Chengez has to there and at film move ahead in that he came to his family and work to Pakistan at lecturer and leader. In film we see that American plotics and news about that he watch T.V. in shows 9/11 American as land of war, triumphalism and bigotry. And Filmmaker this image about that how terrorism attacks to world trade center and this scene at all that fundamentalism and film focus of chengez has Pakistani and every think that he is wrong and not good for there. In film bobby interview and how chengez say that he meet Erice and love them but Erice life has not good, also kill to her boyfriend and at time she is artist and one day she beautifully gives image of Chengez life in her painting but he not like it, at time Chengez goes to native place and how film at moving of interesting scene and chengez has to Pakistan fundamental and their people not have to broken down. In film Mira has use to technology chengez is humiliated by every type of law enforcement. We see that this terrorist scene has too many a people ignore to Muslim become terrorist, Chengez change his ideas and conscience struggle with his identity. 


                   At that time film in that bobby and chengez talk them, after few conversation of both of them, Chengez choose of fundamental, he tells to Mujahidin and their part of this kind of attack them, but chengez has to own ideas and he changes of mind people, it should be translation of community and how chengez Oder and superiors ides of Muslim, and also film has to political, social, individual ideas in film and Mira Nair portatail of changes and bobby characters have plot becomes develop and at end that chengez has third world man, a hybrid of Pakistani poet’s son and also businessmen. We see that film in Bobby argues to chengez, ask that how kill professor and he help to his nut bobby and their friend professor is die and he fight to chengez and at time unfortunately his friend sameer was die and at last speech of chengez has to superiors power and tells to no Muslim or terrorist at all about of humanity and fundamental of their community and never fight of them.

                               So we say that Mira has made a smarter and how characters are individual and necessary of their personality and it became ambitions sometimes exceed the piece’s depth. And we can say that here full of drama and allegoric satire also look them.  So thus that the film main focus of that reluctant fundamental and how American think that to Asian people like bad, there have no humanity but it wrong thinking. So the film has all about that   Fundamental ideas, and in the film location, plot, characters, setting, thematic construe are very well gives them and many scenes are interesting and mysterious one. It may be that the film also 9/11 scene and film left wondering how many of us compelled to re individualism, politics and end of film chengez means filmmaker gives ideas about morality and political priorities of that in film and at time film have to point that life goes on.

                                So we see both of film in post colonial aspect and how filmmaker his or her ideas in characters became moral, individual and stereotypes. If we are stranger our individual has in to what I am written and how a superior is or bad think in novel or film. So as part of post colonial literature in writer has to images about what they do and what they see in other side. It acme more problematic and many a time it have personal think in film or novel. So it’s not personal but there is universal, Anti colonialism and individual think them. And how outsider think of that its problems of their not ours. As it is post colonial means third world country has to rules and images that to what is west and culture as one day, at time pass way and there also about geographical think of what west think them, but this ideas about humanity and universal think of first not individual. 

Movie Review of Film "Midnight's children" Directed by Deepa Maheta.

As we studies about post colonial literature in how colonizer rules and imaged   of colonial.  Colonialism is the imposition of the beliefs and social practices of the dominant power on the subjugated one, resulting in loss or change of the native culture.We know that post colonial image and how people have to leave and culture there and dominated them. It became anti colonialism and how political with draw of an oppressive power. 

   

                I have review about postcolonial studies apply and Salman rusdies work “Midnight’s children” have to became dominated and magic realism in film and realism of Indian people in this film and what happening in film individual and power politic have in characters and plot have over head in Deepa maheta film “Midnight’s children. How is portrayed in film and novel, why they’re there and many counter point of film and novel both of them and how filmmaker directed and portrayed of characters and how they gives image of politics and social structure, may be novelist or filmmaker their own ideas and their individualism in film characters and plot of the film.

                                              In midnight’s children written by Salman rusdies in 1981 and he gives ideas of historical fact and magic realism in novel. this novel base on one film directed by Deepa maheta in film highlight that two country child born together, but this countries not two but one soul and one body of them in past but at time in both country is broken down and fight them, her in film two child born individual at stroke of midnight when India and Pakistan independence from British. In film began that narrator is Saleem Sinai and born in Bombay. In film one child was beggar but it became rich and one Shiva character of child is rich became poor and also we can say that both are neighborhood and in their time many other children are born of India independence.

   

 Here we see that one fault of Nurse and two children are privilege and this scene has nice one and how nurse came to this child house and leave together and at time pass way, she talk about that what she do them to their child and he is not child of Mumtaz and Ahemad Sinai. At that time Saleem has know that  his nose of   Children are know that their born midnight and also saleem say that ‘children of midnight ?, midnight’s children?’ it means that they know that but at time filmmaker create magic gives image and saleem see that all midnight children and talk about them . In film we see that location and place has to only Indian and Pakistan, how darker side and day light scenes in film.

                             We see that in film four generation of leave life and it’s dramatically and dreamy world of there. How this children born of midnight have struggle a lot and filmmaker has made horror, magical, realism and political. How Pakistan, East Pakistan and Indian army and political systems are different and order have to people in this film character like Major Zulfil and also Deepa maheta ideas and individualism of her own experience in film. We can see that father and son relationship like saleem and Ahemad Sinai  and  mother has to care of child and allegory of them in how Saleem know that his mother affair of other man Nadir and he dislike him. Saleem want to his aunt and leave them and at time he work and do them talk to Parvati and other children born midnight. We know that other poor child Shiva join Indian army and he also talk them Parvati and how filmmaker has to create magic like abbraca dabbara generation after generation and Saleem love to Parvati and here we see that partition of Indian and Pakistan this women is die and she born child of Saleem. and We know that Deepa maheta has to image of India women and their life and personality is became different to other women, as it is supernatural power and realism of their life has to more problems and love of male figure has in this film. In the film we find that allegory, drama, romance, magic, love, politics, feminism, realism, partition and supernatural power of there. In Film plot is very complicated not stereotypes of them but very serious one and in film not magic realism at all plot never solve of them as I think so that. Deepa maheta in this film women characters are very practical and responsible one and it may be that her culture. in film saleem’s child has no speak and it save of magic and Parvati’s heritage in their child, but end of that novel and film also end while be chronological way at born of Saleem has stated of film plot and end of that his birth and also we can see that one side Indian freedom and saleem celebrated his birthday and film move a heads. In the film’s words like that in film character picture ji say that ‘This is four hundred twenty one see in sunlight, he is fine child, child of dignity!’.

     

                     Here we can say that no Muslim and no Hinduism at all but only of that humanity first. Became journey of young saleem and Shiva and also we see that words are not at all means but he speaks that “Saleem is Shiva and Shiva is Saleem”. so we can say that Deepa maheta film in chronological way ideas in film locations, characters are individual, politics, social structure, and how power use to people and it may be that Indian and Pakistan so many families’ life are broken down. So we can say that in these film ideas about Deepa maheta’s own experience and individualism of their film character in see them. And we see that Saleem has center and how politics, religious, slum, magic realism in this film. As it my observation of this film in it all the more confounding given that the first half hour or more is devoted to the leisurely unfolding histories of Saleem’s parents and grandparents. So we see that individualism and independence of India and how this children are innocent but at time here no any humanity, its only for politics and religious of them, filmmaker create new think in this has save and developed plot itself as my point that only magic realism in this film became famous at all and individualism in this film. So we thus that as it are different of thinking world and dream world see in this film.